FCT Project References

3.3. Referências Bibliográficas
3.3. Bibliographic References
[PaTi00] 2000 Pawson, R., Tilley, N. (2000) Realistic Evaluation, Sage, London.
[ChSh97] 1997 Chemilinsky, E, Shadish, W. (eds) (1997) Evaluation for the 21st Century, Sage, London
Ru06 2006 Rugh, J. (2006) Addressing the Evaluation Gap. Power point presentation
Pi05 2005 Picciotto, R. (2005) ‘The Evaluation of Policy Coherence for Development’, Evaluation 11(3): 311–30.
[CGD06] 2006 Center for Global Development (2006). When Will We Ever Learn? Improving Lives through Impact Evaluation. Report of the Evaluation Gap Working Group
[WB05] 2005 World Bank (2005). Enabling Capacity to Achieve Results – 2005 Comprehensive Development Framework (CDF) Progress Report. World Bank, Operations Policy and Country Services, Washington, D.C.
HoRo06 2006 Holvoet, N. & Rombouts, H. (2006), The denial of politics in PRSPs M&E: Experiences from Rwanda. European Evaluation Society, International Conference ‘Evaluation and Society: Critical Connections’, London, October 5, 2006.
[WB03] 2003 World Bank (2003). Toward Country-led Development. A Multi-Partner Evaluation of the Comprehensive Development Framework. Synthesis Report. World Bank, Washington, D.C
[OE08] 2008 OECD/DAC (2008). 2008 Survey on Monitoring The Paris Declaration. Effective Aid by 2010 ? What it will take? Paris : OECD/DAC
[OE05] 2005 OECD/DAC (2005). Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: OECD/DAC.
[Da08] 2008 Dabelstein,N. (2008). Development evaluation at a Crossroads? Key Note Speech, European Evaluation Conference, Lisbon.
[Gu06] 2006 Gunning, J.W. (2006). Aid Evaluation: Pursuing Development as if Evidence Matters. Swedish Economic Policy Review, vol. 13, pp. 145-163.
[Ta06] 2006 Tarp, F. (2006). Aid and Development. Swedish Economic Policy Review, vol. 13, pp. 9-61.
Sc08 2008 Scott, J. (2008). Seeing Like a State: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press
WB07 2007 World Bank (2007) Aid Architecture: an Overview of the Main Trends in Offi cial Development Assistance Flows. Washington, DC: International Development Association.
Da02 2002 DAC Development Partnership Forum Report (2002). Managing for development results, Paris, 11–12 December 2002’, DAC Journal on Development 4(1): 1–5.
[HoIn08] 2008 Holvoet, N. and E. Inberg (2008). Monitoring and Evaluation at the Sector Level. Experiences from JSR in the education sector of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger. Unpublished paper, University of Antwerp, Institute of Development Policy and Management.
[Du05] 2005 Duflo, E. (2005). Evaluating the Impact of Development Aid Programs: the Role of Randomized Evaluation’, paper presented at the third AFD-EUDN Conference, Paris
Mo09 2009 Moyo, D. (2009) Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa. London: Penguin books
Ha08 2008 Hanlon, J., & Smart, T. (2008) Há mais bicicletas – mas há mais desenvolvimento?. Maputo:Missanga.
CoSt08 2008 Colin, & Stirrat (2008) Current Challenges in Development Evaluation. Evaluation. LA, London, New Deli, Singapore: Sage Publications.
CGD06 2006 Centre for Global Development (2006). When Will we ever learn. Improving lifes through impact evaluation. Report of the Evaluation Gal Working Group. Washington: Center for Global Development
KiCaGe05 2005 Killick, T., Castel-Branco, C. & Gerster, R. (2004). Perfect Partners The performance of Programme Aid Partners in Mozambique, 2004. Maputo: A report to the Programme Aid Partners and Government of Mozambique.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: